Infrastructure Vault

Purpose

Describe the Vault host configuration, authentication and certificate services, and packaged recovery entry points. This baseline concerns checked-in desired state and supported wrapper structure; it does not establish live unsealed state, successful backups, quorum, or certificate freshness.

Baseline source revision: 550d7e79b1f5fdbc2b6017b75178471d6914082f. Observation date: 2026-09-08. Sources are linked in full; no excerpts are used.

Sources: operator documentation, operational wrappers, Ansible entry points, Vault host template, authentication backends, storage engines, server PKI, client PKI, and public CA outputs.

Requirements

Requirement: Separate host provisioning from Vault configuration

The documented workflow SHALL separate tf_setup VM provisioning, Ansible host setup, and the tf Vault configuration stage. Ansible SHALL expose combined, VM-only, and bare-metal-only setup entry points using the shared host and Vault roles.

Scenario: Prepare an authorized host setup

  • WHEN an operator selects ansible.vm or ansible.bm
  • THEN the wrapper selects the matching checked-in playbook and inventory
  • AND Vault’s API configuration remains owned by the separate Terraform stage

Requirement: Configure TLS endpoints and Raft storage

The host template SHALL configure TLS API and cluster endpoints on ports 8200 and 8201 and Raft storage under /opt/vault/raft. It SHALL derive each Raft node identifier from the inventory hostname and emit retry-join addresses for hosts in the Vault inventory group.

Scenario: Render a Vault host configuration

  • WHEN Ansible renders vault.hcl for a member of the Vault group
  • THEN its API and cluster URLs use its inventory hostname
  • AND Raft receives that hostname as node ID and the group’s HTTPS join URLs

Requirement: Declare authentication and secret-engine boundaries

Terraform SHALL declare userpass, approle, and cert authentication backends, a version-two KV engine at secrets, and a transit engine at transit/default. Client and server certificate authorities SHALL remain distinct, and server PKI ACME SHALL require external account binding with the default directory policy set to forbid.

Scenario: Inspect the configured credential services

  • WHEN the main Terraform configuration is evaluated
  • THEN authentication, KV, transit, client PKI, and server PKI are distinct declared resources
  • AND server ACME is enabled with eab_policy = "always-required"
  • AND published CA output files contain certificate or public-key material

Requirement: Package recovery and certificate operations explicitly

The package SHALL expose separate wrappers for backup, ordinary unseal, standalone unseal, client certificate generation, and root-token generation. Standalone unseal SHALL use the default_no_auth environment without selecting the ordinary unseal plugin; these wrappers SHALL NOT imply that recovery has been executed successfully.

Scenario: Select the standalone unseal workflow

  • WHEN an authorized operator invokes //infra/vault:unseal_standalone
  • THEN the wrapper selects the packaged unseal utility and declared Vault endpoint with its no-auth environment
  • AND success remains an operational result to be observed separately

Requirement: Give each DNS owner a component identity

Every owner that manages DNS records through Terraform SHALL use its existing component AppRole or a dedicated owner AppRole when one is missing. A DNS-only identity SHALL retain the shared AppRole module’s own-state and named shared secret access without cloud provisioning, SSH, or PKI permissions. Existing component identities and unrelated authentication flows SHALL remain stable.

Scenario: Introduce a landing site’s DNS stage

  • WHEN a project has DNS records but no existing component AppRole
  • THEN Vault configuration declares an AppRole named for that owner
  • AND the identity can manage its own Terraform state without access to another owner’s state

Scenario: Add host DNS management

  • WHEN host_bot uses its dedicated DNS AppRole
  • THEN its existing Ansible authentication remains unchanged

Requirement: Restrict provider secret reads to owned DNS views

DNS identities SHALL receive read access to the existing Cloudflare credential only when they own global records and to the existing RouterOS DNS credential only when they own dc1 records. DNS access SHALL NOT grant writes to either provider secret or duplicate credential values.

Scenario: Configure a global-only landing site

  • WHEN an owner declares only global records
  • THEN its DNS policy grants Cloudflare credential reads
  • AND its DNS policy grants no RouterOS credential access

Scenario: Configure records in both views

  • WHEN an owner declares global and dc1 records
  • THEN its DNS policy grants reads for both existing credential references
  • AND neither read policy grants mutation of the provider credential